作者：徐苒, 金炜

作者单位：中国航发商用航空发动机制造有限责任公司, 上海 201306

关键词：民用航空发动机测量过程;测量质量;测量不确定度

摘要：

为实现民用航空发动机测量结果数据质量可量化可控制的目的，该文结合民用航空发动机测量过程特点，采用正态分布作为不确定度分析模型，将测量质量量化为一定置信水平p下的测量数据的分散性即测量过程不确定度；建立涵盖以标准器为起点、测试参数为终点的航空发动机测量过程分级体系，在此基础上分析测量系统设计要求，针对“无法溯源”及“不可达”测量质量控制提供可行的控制手段；最后以某型号发动机液压泵负载系统压力参数测量过程管理为例，说明与传统的计量保障仅关注测量设备的准确度不同，以测量过程不确定度为数据质量控制手段的测量过程控制，能够有效量化并评价整个测量链路的测量质量，进而为发动机产品研制与交付运营提供高质量的测量数据保障。

Research on control method of civil aviation engine measurement process
XU Ran, JIN Wei
AECC Commercial Aircraft Engine Co., Ltd., Shanghai 201306, China
Abstract: In order to realize quantifiable and controllable quality of measurement data of civil aero engine, combined with the characteristics of the civil aviation engine measurement process, and the normal distribution is used as the uncertainty analysis model, the measurement quality is quantified as the dispersion of the measurement data at a certain confidence level p, that is, the uncertainty of the measurement process; A classification system of aero - engine measurement process is established, which takes the standard instrument as the starting point and the test parameters as the end point. On this basis, the design requirements of measurement system are analyzed; To provide feasible control means for untraceable and unreachable measurement quality control. Ends with a type hydraulic pump engine load system pressure measuring process management as an example, shows that different from the traditional measurement guarantee only focus on the accuracy of measurement equipment, process to measure the uncertainty of measurement process control of data quality control means, effectively to quantify and evaluate the measurement uncertainty, then provide high quality measurement data security to engine product development and operations.
Keywords: civil aviation engine measurement process;measurement qulity;measurement uncertainty
2020, 46(5):19-24  收稿日期: 2019-04-06;收到修改稿日期: 2019-07-02
基金项目:
作者简介: 徐苒(1985-),女,上海市人,工程师,硕士,主要从事民用航空发动机测量过程控制及计量校准技术工作
参考文献
[1] 刘碧野, 崔绍颖, 马梦妍. NASA校准周期确定的分析[J]. 计量技术, 2018(8): 56-58
[2] CASTRUP H T, EICKE W G, HAYES J L, et al. Metrology — calibration and measurement processes guidelines[M]. NASA Reference Publication: Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology, 1994:23-41.
[3] 李应红. 航空涡轮风扇发动机试验技术与方法[M]. 上海: 上海交通大学出版社, 2014: 10-14.
[4] 测量不确定度评定与表示: JJF1059.1—2012[S]. 北京: 中国质检出版社, 2012.
[5] 装备计量保障通用要求检测和校准: GJB 5109—2004[S]. 北京: 总装备部军标出版社, 2004.
[6] TADEUSZ S. Uncertainty of the calibrating instrument, confidence in the measurement process and the relation between them[J]. Independent Consultant, 2001(3): 5-10
[7] 朱伦伦. 测量仪器校准间隔优化及校准结论风险评估研究[D]. 长沙: 国防科学技术大学, 2016.
[8] 段小维, 薛文鹏. 某飞行台被试发动机液压负载系统设计[J]. 科技创新与应用, 2017(9): 10-12
[9] 白国长, 王占林, 祁晓野. 航空液压泵变负载加速寿命试验台研制[J]. 液压与气动, 2006(3): 47-50
[10] 李大伟, 郭建, 赵玮. 一种液压负载模拟系统的研究[J]. 机床与液压, 2014, 42(2): 60-62
[11] 陈怀艳, 曹芸, 韩洁. 基于蒙特卡罗法的测量不确定度评定[J]. 电子测量与仪器学报, 2011, 25(4): 301-308
[12] 杭强, 周骏. 统计过程控制在测量结果质量控制中的应用[J]. 中国计量, 2015(3): 54-56