作者：文海
作者单位：中国华阴兵器试验中心计量测试站, 陕西 华阴 714200
关键词：测量活动;管控效果;模糊综合评价法;评定工具
摘要：
鉴于靶场试验测量活动大多为现场测量，尤其需要注重管控，其效果与满足测量要求的程度直接相关，是信任测量结果的主观前提。该文依据GJB 9001B2009和GJB 2725A2001等标准，运用模糊综合评价法，建立涵盖岗位人员、测量设备、测量过程、测试方法和环境条件5个方面的测量活动管控效果评价模型，并给出评分指南。最后，为方便模型应用，开发基于移动应用的评定工具APP程序。APP程序的试用结果表明：该方法具有严谨的评价准则和指标，既可以在线评定，使靶场一线测量活动得到规范，又可以事后评定，确认试验测量结果是否值得被信任。
Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method for management control effect in measurement activities
WEN Hai
Department of Metrology & Testing, Huayin Ordnance Test Center, Huayin 714200, China
Abstract: As most of the measurement activities of range test are carried out in field, the management and control are particularly important. The effect of management and control is directly related to the degree of meeting measurement requirements, and it is the subjective premise of the trust measurement results. In accordance with the requirements of GJB 9001B-2009 and GJB 2725A-2011, and by using of the comprehensive evaluation method, a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model of management and control effect is established in this paper. The model covers the measurement activities in five aspects, such as staff on positions, measuring equipment, measuring process, methods and environmental conditions. And this paper also gives the scoring guide. In the last part, an APP program as evaluation tool is provided, which is developed based on the mobile application to facilitate the application of the model. The trial results of APP program show that the method integrates rigorous evaluation criteria and indicators, which allows the online evaluation to normalize the range front-line measurement activities and the post-evaluation to confirm the reliability of the test results.
Keywords: measurement of activity;management control effect;fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method;application for evaluation.
2018, 44(1): 16-20 收稿日期: 2017-04-05;收到修改稿日期: 2017-06-30
基金项目: 军内科研（012016018200B11303）
作者简介: 文海(1972-),男,四川遂宁市人,高级工程师,硕士,主要从事军事计量和装备信息化研究。
参考文献
[1] 文海,程斌,张开维. 炮用象限仪角度测量不确定度的评定方法[J]. 兵工学报,2017,38(4):817-823.
[2] 李汉英. 层次分析法评价实验室质量管理体系的有效性[J].质量技术监督研究,2013,28(4):30-34.
[3] 季大琴,徐远新. 质量管理过程有效性评估分析及分类研究[J]. 舰船电子工程,2014,34(4):120-121,135.
[4] 靳莹,乔新勇,顾程. 坦克发动机技术状况检测与评价方法研究[J]. 中国测试,2016,42(9):6-10.
[5] 金婧. 基于模糊综合评价法的航空运输业风险成本计量研究[D]. 西安:长安大学,2015.
[6] CUI J G, FU K Y, CHEN X C, et al. Multiple attribute maintenance decision making of aircraft based on grey-funzziness and analytical hieranchy process[J]. Hangkong Xuebao/Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica,2014,35(2):478-486.
[7] 质量管理体系要求:GJB 9001B-2009[S]. 北京:中国计量出版社,2009.
[8] 测试实验室和校准实验室通用要求:GJB 2725A-2001[S]. 北京:中国计量出版社,2001.
[9] 黄演忠,郑军,何少宁,等. 运用4M1E分析法提高安全管理水平[J]. 建材世界,2014,35(6):97-101.
[10] 装备计量保障通用要求检测和校准:GJB 5109-2004[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2004.
[11] 文海,张明,王柯. 靶场信息化项目经费的估算方法[J]. 兵工自动化,2016,35(10):19-22.
