您好,欢迎来到中国测试科技资讯平台!

首页> 《中国测试》期刊 >本期导读>聚焦换能器声强和声功率测量方法研究

聚焦换能器声强和声功率测量方法研究

2903    2017-02-16

免费

全文售价

作者:于群, 王月兵, 曹文旭, 汤卓翰

作者单位:中国计量大学计量测试工程学院, 浙江 杭州 310018


关键词:应用声学;声功率评价方法;声强法;聚焦换能器


摘要:

针对聚焦声场的特点,以及辐射力天平(RFB)只能获得单一功率指标的缺点,提出一种基于近场测量法的聚焦换能器声强和声功率评价方法。通过声场测量系统对聚焦换能器预聚焦区域中两个平面上的声压扫描测量,运用声强法得到聚焦换能器的声强分布以及辐射声功率。采用活塞换能器的远场测量法与近场测量法进行比对,两种方法得到的声功率误差不超过12%。比较预聚焦区域声功率值和焦点处声功率值,分析声功率评价方法的准确性。发现聚焦声场中不同位置处的声功率值一致性误差5%,同一位置处的声功率值重复性误差2%。结果表明,近场测量法适用于对聚焦换能器声强和声功率的评价,可有效避免直接测量对测量设备的损坏,同时还克服双水听器声强互谱法频率上限低以及测量系统相位不匹配的缺点。


Study on sound intensity and sound power measurement of focused transducer

YU Qun, WANG Yuebing, CAO Wenxu, TANG Zhuohan

College of Metrological Technology and Engineering, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou 310018, China

Abstract: According to the features of focused sound field and given that radiation force balance (RFB) can only obtain a single power indicator, the paper proposes a method for evaluating sound intensity and sound power of focused transducer based on near-field measurement method. Sound field measurement system is used to have scanning measurement of the sound pressure on two planes within pre-focus area of focused transducer. Sound intensity method is used to obtain the sound pressure distribution and radiant sound power of focused transducer. Comparing the near-field measurement method and far-field measurement method of piston transducer, it is found that the error rate of sound power of the two methods is less than 12%. By comparing the sound power of pre-focused area and the sound power at point of focus and analyzing the accuracy of sound power evaluating method, it is found that the sound power consistency error at different locations in focused sound field is less than 5% and the sound power repeatability of same location is less than 2%. Results show that the near-field measurement method is suitable for evaluating sound intensity and sound power of focused transducer as it avoids the damage of measured equipment caused by direct measurement effectively and also overcomes the disadvantages of the low upper limit of frequency in measuring the cross-spectrum density of sound pressure between two hydrophones and the unmatched phase in measurement system.

Keywords: applied acoustics;sound power evaluation method;sound intensity method;focused transducer

2017, 43(1): 27-32  收稿日期: 2016-06-18;收到修改稿日期: 2016-08-09

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目(11474259)

作者简介: 于群(1990-),男,黑龙江五常市人,硕士研究生,专业方向为精密仪器及机械。

参考文献

[1] 许阳. 相控阵聚焦换能器的非线性声场研究[D]. 南京:南京大学,2013.
[2] 李全义,李发琪,寿文德. 高强度聚焦超声(HIFU)的声场检测[J]. 世界科技研究与发展,2007,29(6):56-60.
[3] 谢露. 相控聚焦超声声场分析及测量实验研究[D]. 上海:上海交通大学,2008.
[4] 张谷香,王怀应. 水声声强测量分析系统及其在水下噪声鉴别中的应用[J]. 应用声学,1996(4):33-37.
[5] 原春晖,张国良,张维衡,等. 声强法测声功率的工程应用研究[J]. 噪声与振动控制,2001,21(3):17-22.
[6] 张林,杨德森. 声强测量系统用双水听器的校准方法研究[J]. 哈尔滨工程大学学报,2002,23(4):1-4.
[7] 谢荣基,万宇鹏,姚小兵. 基于声强测量的卷接机组噪声源识别[J]. 中国测试,2014,40(5):29-31.
[8] FAHY F J, PIERRI R. Application of cross-spectral density to a measurement of vibration power flow between connected plates[J]. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,1977,62(5):1297-1298.
[9] CHUNG J Y. Cross-spectral method of measuring acoustic intensity without error caused by instrument phase mismatch[J]. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1978,64(6):1613-1616.
[10] 罗晓松,陆燕芳. 声强测量及其应用[J]. 电声技术,1989(6):25-31.
[11] CHUNG J Y, POPE J. Practical measurement of acoustic intensity-The two-microphone cross-spectral method[C]//INTER-NOISE and NOISE-CON Congress and Conference Proceedings,1978:893-900.
[12] 刘星,时胜国,战国辰,等. 水下声强测量技术在近场测量中的应用研究[J]. 哈尔滨工程大学学报,2002,23(1):95-98.
[13] 郑士杰,袁文俊,缪荣兴,等. 水声计量测试技术[M]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工程大学出版社,1995:410-424.
[14] 何祚镛,何元安,商德江. 双水听器水声声强测量系统的误差分析和校准[J]. 声学学报,2000(3):235.