作者：刘远宏

作者单位：武警工程大学装备工程学院, 陕西 西安 710086

关键词：测试性;熵权;理想点;评价指标

摘要：

针对综合传动装置测试性参数选择时存在的参数种类多、参数选择缺乏理论指导等问题，提出基于熵权理想点法的综合传动装置测试性参数评价方法。其基本思想是依据综合传动装置可靠性、维修性和可用性有关的使用要求选出待评价的测试性参数，并将使用要求作为测试性参数评价指标，构建指标优属度矩阵，计算评价指标熵权，在此基础上计算加熵权后的指标优属度矩阵的理想点，分析被评价参数与理想点间的贴近度，依据贴近度的值进行排序，获得各参数的优劣顺序。实例分析结果表明：该方法通过指标优属度矩阵获得测试性参数的优劣顺序，为综合传动装置测试性参数选择和指标制定提供依据。

Testability parameters evaluation of integrated transmission based on entropy weight ideal point

LIU Yuanhong

School of Equipment Engineering, Engineering University of CAPF, Xi'an 710086, China

Abstract: An evaluation method of integrated transmission testability parameters based on entropy weight ideal point is presented, aiming to resolve the issue that parameters are chose by experience and lack of guidance. Firstly, primary testability parameters of integrated transmission are selected based on reliability, maintainability and availability requirements of integrated transmission and are used to act as qualitative evaluation indexes. Secondly, the index membership matrix is constructed, and the entropy weight of the indexes is obtained. Thirdly, the ideal point is computed based on the index membership matrix plus entropy weight. Finally, the closeness degrees among testability parameters and ideal point are computed, based on which the testability parameters are sorted. The result of example analysis shows that the testability parameters are put in order by the index membership degree matrix in the absence of expert weights case, which provides a basis for the testability parameters selection of integrated transmission.

Keywords: testability;entropy weight;ideal point;evaluation index

2017, 43(4): 11-14  收稿日期: 2016-08-29;收到修改稿日期: 2016-10-15

基金项目: 

作者简介: 刘远宏(1987-),男,江西萍乡市人,讲师,博士,主要从事机电液系统测控技术与故障诊断研究。

参考文献

[1] 装备测试性大纲:GJB 2547-1995[S].北京:国防科学技术委员会,1995.
[2] 冯辅周,从华,刘远宏. PHM实施模式及其对装甲装备建设的影响[C]//装甲兵工程学院第十三届学术年会,2012:107-112
[3] BELLEHSEN D M, KELLY B A, HANANIA A, et al. Automated testability decision tool[R]. ADA241865,1991.
[4] KLION J. A Rational and approach for defining and structuring testability requirements[R]. ADA162617,1985.
[5] 张延生,黄考利,连光耀. 基于改进AHP法的导弹装备测试性参数选择方法研究[J]. 计算机测量与控制,2011,19(2):412-414.
[6] 王磊,施荣华. 企业信息化多层次模糊综合评价方法[J].系统工程,2012,30(2):124-126.
[7] 张识宇,徐济超,李大建. 基于Theil指数的公司风险投资项目灰色评价方法[J]. 系统工程理论与实践,2011,31(11):2502-2509.
[8] 钟群芳,郭长欢,黄建. 基于多层模糊评估模型的直升机供电系统综合评估方法[J]. 国外电子测量技术,2015,34(11):27-31.
[9] 徐保荣,李荣利,魏火明,等. 综合传动装置故障模式危害性的熵权模糊综合评价[J]. 兵工学报,2013,34(11):1381-1386.
[10] 刘春来,郭三学,高义旗. 基于模糊层次分析法的非致命防暴弹作战效能评估[J]. 火力与指挥控制,2014,39(3):60-68.
[11] 田仲,石君友. 系统测试性设计分析与验证[M]. 北京:北京航空航天大学出版社,2003:69-70.
[12] 王刚. 装备测试性参数优化选择技术研究[D]. 长沙:国防科学技术大学,2010.
[13] 履带式装甲车辆综合传动装置通用规范:GJB 5386-2005[S]. 北京:国防科工委军标出版发行部,2005.
[14] 陈希祥,邱静,刘冠军. 装备系统BIT权衡分析与选择技术研究[J]. 仪器仪表学报,2011,32(9):2079-2086.