作者：舒少波¹, 黄林果¹, 谭清²

作者单位：1. 成都市石油化学工业园区环境监测站，四川 成都 610066;
2. 四川省成都生态环境监测中心站，四川 成都 610066

关键词：电子信息产业区;臭氧;挥发性有机物(VOCs );来源分析

摘要：

为了解某电子信息产业区（以下简称“产业区”）夏季臭氧污染与挥发性有机物特征，结合数据分析臭氧污染过程与VOCs特征组分，并对VOCs进行来源分析；本次研究共检测出化合物94种，各类VOCs浓度排序烷烃﹥卤代烃﹥芳香烃﹥OVOCs﹥烯烃﹥炔烃，根据臭氧生成潜势分析，臭氧的整体浓度水平高低与VOCs的臭氧生成潜势和天气因素等都存在明显关系；选取臭氧高值时段结合氮氧化物、PM_2.5、VOCs分析臭氧污染过程，臭氧呈现规律的单峰变化与NO_x、PM_2.5都存在相反的变化趋势；PMF模型源解析分析结果表明臭氧高值时段主要污染是以苯系物为主的工业排放源对产业区臭氧生成贡献率最高。

Analysis of VOCs pollution characteristics in an electronic information industry area in summer
SHU Shaobo¹, HUANG Linguo¹, TAN Qing²
1. Chengdu Environmental Monitoring Station for Petrochemical Industrial Park, Chengdu 610066, China;
2. Chengdu Ecological & Environmental Monitoring Center, Chengdu 610066, China
Abstract: In order to understand the characteristics of ozone pollution and volatile organic compounds in an electronic information industry area in summer, the ozone pollution process and the characteristic components of VOCs were analyzed combined with data, and the source of VOCs was analyzed. A total of 94 compounds were detected in this study, and the concentration order of various VOCs is alkanes > halogenated hydrocarbons > aromatic hydrocarbons > OVOCs > olefins > alkynes. According to the analysis of ozone generation potential, the overall concentration level of ozone is obviously related to the ozone generation potential of VOCs and weather factors. Select the period of high ozone value to analyze the ozone pollution process in combination with nitrogen oxides, PM_2.5 and VOCs. Ozone shows a regular unimodal change, which is opposite to NO_x and PM_2.5. The source analysis results of PMF model show that during the high ozone value period, the industrial emission source dominated by benzene homologues has the highest contribution rate to ozone generation in the industrial area.
Keywords: electronic information industry zone;ozone;volatile organic compounds(VOCs);source analysis
2022, 48(10):175-180  收稿日期: 2022-07-06;收到修改稿日期: 2022-09-13
基金项目:
作者简介: 舒少波（1988-），男，四川彭州市人，工程师，主要从事环境分析与检测
参考文献
[1] CHANG D, SONG Y, LIU B. Visibility trends in six mega-citiesin China 1973-2007[J]. Atmospheric Research, 2009, 94(2): 161-167
[2] ROHDE R A, MULLER R A. Air pollution in China: mapping of concentrations and sources[J]. Plos One, 2015, 10(8): 1-14
[3] 薛俊海, 邱兆军, 吕焕明, 等. 热脱附-气相色谱/质谱联用法测定家具中释放的 27 种苯系物[J]. 中国测试, 2020, 46(11): 53-58
[4] 王东哲. 全球挥发性有机化合物定义解析[J]. 现代涂料与涂装, 2015, 18(9): 33-36
[5] ZHANG Y H, LI C, YAN Q S, et al. Typical industrial sectorbased volatile organic compounds source profiles and ozoneformation potentials in Zhengzhou, China[J]. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 2020, 11(5): 841-850
[6] 李佳, 陈勇, 张渝, 等. 挥发性有机物与非甲烷总烃的相关性研究[J]. 中国测试, 2019, 45(12): 75-82
[7] 张文斌, 谭丽, 王赞春, 等. 重庆市沙坪坝区大气 VOCs 与健康影响评估[J]. 中国测试, 2017, 43(3): 43-48
[8] LI L Y, XIE S D, ZENG L M, et al. Characteristics of volatileorganic compounds and their role in ground-level ozone formationin the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, China[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2015, 113: 247-254
[9] XU Z N, HUANG X, NIE W, et al. Influence of synoptic condition and holiday effects on VOCs and ozone production in the YangtzeRiver Delta region, China[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2017, 168: 112-124
[10] 曹梦瑶, 林煜棋, 章炎麟. 南京工业区秋季大气挥发性有机物污染特征及来源解析[J]. 环境科学, 2020, 41(6): 2565-2576
[11] 曾鹏, 辛存林, 于奭, 等. 典型西南工业城市柳州市核心区大气污染物时空分布与气象因素研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2020, 40(1): 13-26
[12] CARTER W P L. Development of ozone reactivity scales for volatileorganic compounds[J]. Air & Waste, 1994, 44(7): 881-899
[13] GROSJEAN D. In situ organic aerosol formation during a smog episode: estimated production and chemical functionality[J]. Atmospheric Environment. Part A. General Topics, 1992, 26(6): 953-963
[14] POLISSAR A V, HOPKE P K, PAATERO P, et al. The aerosol atBarrow, Alaska: long-term trends and source locations[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 1999, 33(16): 2441-2458
[15] 闫慧, 张维, 侯墨, 等. 我国地级及以上城市臭氧污染来源及控制区划分[J]. 环境科学, 2020, 41(12): 4-13
[16] 兰梦迪. 宜春市臭氧污染特征及其影响因素分析[J]. 河南科技, 2022, 779(9): 114-119
[17] 刘齐, 卢星林, 曾鹏, 等. 柳州市春季大气挥发性有机物污染特征及源解析[J]. 环境科学, 2021, 42(1): 65-74